.
Feedback

Missouri Tobacco Tax, Judicial Ballot Questions Fail At The Polls

The most contested statewide ballot question asked if voters would raise tobacco taxes to fund education and anti-smoking initiatives. Other measures asked for changes in the selection of judges, and local control of the St. Louis Police Department.

Update 1:36 a.m. Wednesday with final update with 100 percent reporting

Among the items on the ballot were four statewide ballot questions, the most notably contested was Proposition B, which would would increase tobacco taxes $0.0365 per cigarette and 25% of the manufacturer's invoice price for roll-your-own tobacco and 15% for other tobacco products, according to the ballot language. Estimated revenues of at least $283 million would fund public education in Missouri along with smoking prevention programs.

Yes: 49.2 %

No:  50.8 %

 

Other statewide questions:

  • Proposition A, which if passed, would put the City of St. Louis Police Department under local control.

Yes: 63.9 %

No: 36.1 % 

  • Constitutional Amendment 3, would reform the judicial selection process in Missouri at the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals level. Proponents of the amendment have abandoned their campaign for the measure, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported, citing bias in the ballot language approved by Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan. 

Yes: 24 %

No: 76 %

  • Proposition E would prohibit the Governor or any state agency, from establishing or operating state-based health insurance exchanges unless authorized by a vote of the people or by the legislature.

Yes: 61.8 % 

No: 38.2  %

erin November 7, 2012 at 05:29 am
What about the library and special school district tax, did they pass?
Gregg Palermo (Editor) November 7, 2012 at 07:03 am
Yes, they both passed.
Christy Singer November 7, 2012 at 02:25 pm
It's totally embarrassing that our state cannot pass a increased tobacco tax.
Devon Seddon November 7, 2012 at 04:52 pm
Why? What's sad is that you people think that the government getting more money from something (and someone else as usual) fixes anything.
Tax it. Problem solved. It's balogna. Less than 1% would've gone to schools, NONE to non-smoking programs. They didn't even try to indicate where the rest that money would've gone, or what it would be used for (why not, I wonder), yet you've been programmed to think that somehow a 760% tax increase would somehow magically fix something. The sad thing here is also is that your conditioning has overridden common-sense. There's endless proof that these politicians (in both parties) are irresponsible & dishonest with our money, yet you tools always think we need to give them more & more to mis-managed. Houdini's elephant didn't disappear in that room full of people, he drew their attention away from it so they didn't see what happened to it.
Gary K Lee November 7, 2012 at 05:24 pm
It should have been a smaller increase and eliminated a couple loop holes that caused a couple special interest groups to take a stand against it. Then it would have passed.
Toni Cook November 7, 2012 at 07:58 pm
I resent Devon Sedon's use of such disparaging terms as "you people" and "fools". Why did he feel it necessary to use this terminology? We've survived a very devisive campaign. No matter who you supported, or what propositions you supported, you are entitled to your opinion. I'm tired of the rudeness, anger and attacks on anyone who says what they think. You can disagree, but I hope that intolerance will take a back seat to civility.
flyoverland November 7, 2012 at 08:32 pm
Perhaps, the cigarette tax should be revisited, but with a different recipient of the tax receipts. There is no connection between schools and smokers. Smokers already pay plenty toward schools, (as do all of us). If the goal is to stop new smokers from starting and get smokers to quit, here's an idea. The tax should be increased, however, all the money should go lung cancer research and treatment programs at Missouri medical research institutions, primarily, the DNA program at Washington U. Smokers who insist on smoking would feel at least they were funding a program that would possibly help them if they turn out to be one of the one in ten smokers who will contract lung cancer. The price increase would still have the desired negative economic effect. Everyone knows the legislature can find many was to divert special sin taxes from the advertised purpose via fungibility. You can compel them to direct the sin tax towards the purpose, but you cannot force them to continue funding the target program at the same levels, so sin taxes simply raise the state general revenue fund. Since the state doesn't really fund lung cancer research, the tax would, by default go to the right place. The program at Wash U. is groundbreaking and only needs money to yield real, lifesaving results. Their efforts could also create many new jobs. This is the right course, unless, of course you want to just outlaw cigarettes, which i think would be a great idea.
carolyn manno November 7, 2012 at 08:43 pm
I am glad its over, can we get on with our lives
Scott Simon November 7, 2012 at 08:47 pm
Why? Because pro-tax people called us fools and idiots. The human law of physics.
Ken Kelley November 8, 2012 at 01:00 am
Never in world history, at Roman orgies have so many people been SCREWED at one time as was the case when oboma was relected. If you thought it could not get any worse just watch now what will happen to the American Economy!!!!
Christy Singer November 8, 2012 at 01:31 am
Devon, it is actually B-O-L-O-G-N-A, fyi.
Joe B November 8, 2012 at 03:09 am
Next the goverment will tax you on your 40oz drinks because it makes you fat.
Christy Singer November 8, 2012 at 03:00 pm
Joe is comparing apples and orangutans. Food and drink (which ARE taxed items, anyway) are necessary to sustain life (though there are clearly vast differences in the quality of what one might choose). Cigarettes not so much. Furthermore, there is NO amount of cigarette smoke that is safe for anyone. Have smokers forgotten that they are lighting something on fire and breathing the smoke? This is not nuclear physics. Still, I wouldn't mind if insured smokers wanted to kill themselves slowly, but the fact is smoking negatively impacts everyone, not only health-wise (second-hand smoke) but also economically in the loss of productivity and healthcare for uninsured sufferers of smoking-related disease. As a side note, I think it would be nice if current smokers would volunteer to help care for uninsured smokers suffering from smoking related diseases.
Linda Sanford November 8, 2012 at 04:41 pm
Angry non-smoking TAX payer
We are taxed on everything we own, purchase and consume. The goverment officials sit around and think of new ways to get more tax dollars to spend. We are all ask to tighten our belt yet, the government does not do the same. One way they could get all the money they need is to put a new tax on gasoline. Say, $1.00 dollar per gallon for the state government and $1.00 per gallon for the federal government. I'll bet everyone out there would agree with this, not. People are to eager to vote yes on a tax increase that does not effect them. The majority of the country consumes gasoline so this would be a fair tax for everyone. The government could say this would be for the schools and campaigns to get people to stop smoking, drinking alcohol, drinking sugary drinks, eating fatty foods and on and on and on. Now how would they keep this tax separate fron all the other taxes we pay. They would not, it would go in the general fund, just like all the lottery and casino money. I just don't know how the middle class citizens of this country can pay anymore taxes. We, the middle working class, already pay 40% to 60% of the money we earn. Can anyone imagine how much our government takes in? And, we are still borrowing money to run our federal and local government. I always vote no on any tax increase because I know they will find a way to get more tax dollars from the people where we have no vote.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Creve Coeur Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
flyoverland June 12, 2013 at 11:46 am
More about the Ladue site than yours. Just seems like stories are staying up longer. Maybe its justRead More the summer doldrums.
Robin Tidwell June 12, 2013 at 11:51 am
I didn't notice sign-in issues for more than a day, but I don't sign in every time either. As forRead More "more stuff, less news," I agree with Fly - putting the blogs under the headlines in the same column can make it appear that blogs are news too. Unless it's mine, of course! ;) Guess the announcements take up more space, but don't ever seem to change. And if Patch is all about local, shouldn't there be fewer national ads - esp. the garbage ones like "5 Veggies that kill Belly Fat?" Ugh. Just my two cents...
Stephanie R. June 12, 2013 at 11:59 am
Robin, no one local is buying ads to replace the national GoogleAds. No story about Monday's cityRead More council meeting. Guess it's hard for one editor to cover 2-3 cities.
Scott Simon June 12, 2013 at 04:05 pm
Thomas, AMEN to this issue I raised earlier this year with the Chamber. Image is everything. And theRead More Olivette City Council saw this too and pulled the plug. Creve Coeur, not so much, LOL. Not sure what business you own but if I know and get the chance, I'll support you because your're a right-thinking kind of businessman who knows how to define LOCAL.
Scott Simon June 12, 2013 at 04:15 pm
I think it's AMAZING the Creve Coeur/Olivette Chamber can't hold its golf tournament at the CREVERead More COEUR Golf Club, insider the Dielmann Rec. Complex, named after the Chamber's MEMBERSHIP DIRECTOR. I'm amazed. Also not surprised.
Ryan June 13, 2013 at 09:16 am
http://www.ccochamber.com/ccochamber/event.jsp?id=249
Kurt Greenbaum (Editor) June 2, 2013 at 05:49 pm
Thank you, Susan! Very grateful for your feedback and we appreciate you being a Patch reader.
Scott Simon May 30, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Whaddaya expect, if it's not broken, fix it! Just like Creve Coeur Government!
Gregg Palermo (Editor) May 30, 2013 at 08:13 am
Thanks for asking! I'm working on a follow up story on that. Do you live in Orchard Lakes? What doRead More you think?
Chris June 6, 2013 at 09:39 am
I live in the subdivision and I can not wait for these offers to come in and to find out what isRead More going to happen. I for one plan on taking it if it is good. The subdivision is in rough shape, the sewers are falling apart and too many of the owners have moved away and just rent the homes to people who are not taking care of them or they are switching out tenants every year. If this one fails another will come and sooner or later one will get it. The hold outs are getting older and the younger families are going to jump at a chance to get out of their homes with doing absolutely no repairs.
Lindsay Toler (Editor) June 4, 2013 at 01:46 pm
It IS kinda pea-soup green. I like it - supposed to evoke "grassroots" news, I think!