.
Feedback

Missouri Voters Overwhelmingly OK 'Right to Pray' Amendment

U.S. Rep. Todd Akin wins the GOP nomination for U.S. Senate. Businessman Dave Spence wins the GOP nomination for governor.

A state constitutional amendment touted as a "right to pray" provision has won by better than a four-to-one margin.

Proponents say Amendment 2 protects the right of Missourians to pray in public. Opponents of the measure say those protections are already guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and the amendment would be a boon for lawyers, who will battle in court over unintended consequences spawned by the provision.

Meanwhile in the race for the GOP nomination for U.S. Senate, U.S. Rep. Todd Akin, R-Wildwood, has won. The Springfield News-Leader declared Akin the winner with about 80 percent of votes tallied. Akin faced down challengers Sarah Steelman, the former state treasurer, and businessman John Brunner has 29 percent.

In the race for the GOP nomination for governor, businessman Dave Spence is the winner to face incumbent Gov. Jay Nixon in November.

Here's a summary of results (see vote totals on the our news partner FOX2Now's website):

GOVERNOR: Incumbent Democrat Jay Nixon ran away with the nomination. In the GOP race, businessman Dave Spence won over three challengers.

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR: It's Susan Montee for the Democrats. In the GOP race, Peter Kinder locks it up in the race against three other challengers.

SECRETARY OF STATE: Democrat Jason Kander ran away with the nomination. For the Republican nomination, Shane Schoeller beat Scott Rupp and Bill Stouffer.

ATTORNEY GENERAL: GOP politician Ed Martin pounds Adam Lee Warren.

Here are the statewide races we're following tonight. Results will be posted as more substantial results come in.

STATEWIDE RACES/BALLOT MEASURES

Italic indicates projected or final winner. See the Secretary of State website for vote totals.

AMENDMENT 2 ()

"Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure: That the right of Missouri citizens to express their religious beliefs shall not be infringed; that school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools; and; that all public schools shall display the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution."

  • Yes (approving the amendment)
  • No

U.S. SENATE

Republican

  • John Brunner
  • Todd Akin
  • Sarah Steelman
  • Hector Maldonado
  • Mark Lodes
  • Mark Memoly
  • Robert Poole
  • Jerry Beck

Democrat

  • Claire McCaskill

Libertarian

  • Jonathan Dine

GOVERNOR

Republican

  • Dave Spence
  • Bill Randles
  • Fred Sauer
  • John Weiler

Democrat

  • Jay Nixon
  • Clay Thunderhawk
  • William B. Campbell

Libertarian

  • Jim Higgins

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

Republican

  • Peter Kinder
  • Brad Lager
  • Mike Carter
  • Charles Kullmann

Democrat

  • Judy Baker
  • Bill Haas
  • Sara Lampe
  • Susan Montee
  • Dennis Weisenburger
  • Fred Kratky
  • Jackie Townes McGee
  • Becky Lee Plattner

Libertarian

  • Matthew Copple

Constitution

  • Cynthia Davis

SECRETARY OF STATE

Republican

  • Scott Rupp
  • Shane Schoeller
  • Bill Stouffer

Democrat

  • Jason Kander
  • MD Rabbi Alam

Libertarian

  • Cisse Spragins

Constitution

  • Justin Harter

TREASURER

Republican

  • Cole McNary

Democrat

  • Clint Zweifel

Libertarian

  • Sean O'Toole

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Republican

  • Ed Martin
  • Adam Warren

Democrat

  • Chris Koster

Libertarian

  • Dave Browning
Mike K August 8, 2012 at 11:19 am
Way to go, fellow Missourians. Just wait until the girls in your kid's school are wearing full hijabs and the boys turbans as expressions of their faith, just like the tibowing and crosses the Christians wear.
Allah help us all.
CJ August 8, 2012 at 12:30 pm
I can not believe more people have not seen thru Todd Akins Line of C**p. He is all about himself and having a personal agenda against the democrats. Politicians like him are why we can get any thing accomplished. Also the platform of being all about the veterans is a lie he won't even call you back if the media is not present.
Terry Wilson Resmer August 8, 2012 at 12:45 pm
This isn't about dress codes. God will help us we just need to keep on praying to him. God Bless
Earl Higgins August 8, 2012 at 01:46 pm
I don't have any problem with anybody who wants to wear a hijab, turban, or a cross, why should anybody? All these were already protected before this silly amendment. Don't we have more important issues than this silly nonissue?
Rockwood 25 August 8, 2012 at 11:28 pm
On mini news debate, the selected Amendment supporter stated that we all already had the religious rights in the bill; they wanted to "highlight" them. Meanwhile, I do fear the abuses students will attempt to avoid class work. Even the supporter in the debate said they expect things to get straightened out in legal suits about this part of the law. More litigation. Meanwhile, what happens in the classroom? Great.
Larry Lazar August 9, 2012 at 12:39 am
Missouri citizens just voted for millions of dollars in legal fees, much of which will be paid to out of state lawyers - money that could have actually done something useful.
We always like the simple solutions. It's almost always wrong, but it is simple.
Eric Seider August 10, 2012 at 05:28 pm
From the Missouri School Board Association (non-partisan viewpoint)
http://www.msbanet.org/files/law_policy_labor/law/ReligiousFreedomAmendmentHJR2.pdf "As you can see, the proposed language has some very interesting nuances that could conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment. Because of this conflict, school districts will face confusion in developing policies to meet the requirements of the new law and will face additional classroom burdens in implementing the new requirements. Also, districts will likely face lawsuits based upon individuals attempting to define exactly what the new law means and which law, federal or state, will govern. Also remember this is a proposal seeking to amend the state constitution. It is not a proposed statute. Once passed, a constitution is difficult to amend. It is a lengthy, time consuming and difficult process to even get a measure placed on a ballot. Therefore, it is likely that, if passed, this amendment will be Missouri law for quite some time."
Karl Frank Jr. August 10, 2012 at 06:06 pm
A total waste of taxpayer money just to ultimately be removed. The Supremacy Clause should handle the State Constitution part, if I understand it right. One of my friends said it was a jobs creation program for attorneys. :)
Eric Seider August 10, 2012 at 06:41 pm
Totally agree, Karl. This is just another burden put on public schools by our government that will cause confusion, take additional resources to implement, and eventually be discarded due to lawsuits.
Larry Lazar August 10, 2012 at 06:55 pm
agreed - this is an incredible waste of tax payer money, money which could have actually done something beneficial to the state of Missouri and it's residents.
Striek August 10, 2012 at 07:12 pm
Agreed as well. More needless cost and rule put on schools.
This part of the amendment: "That school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools" seems to apply to private schools too, which has interesting ramifications. And the last part about mandatory displaying the Bill of Rights in public schools - not really a big deal since it gets covered in curriculum and is in many classrooms already... but to me it seems like the silly sort of mandate that one would expect from an authoritarian-type goverment.
Kevin Lane August 11, 2012 at 08:27 am
Or in a place where people try to make you forget them....
Kevin Lane August 11, 2012 at 08:41 am
BTW - An "authoritarian-type government" doesn't usually go around posting your rights so you can see them every single day. An "authoritarian-type government" would be the kind that would try to take them away.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Creve Coeur Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
flyoverland June 12, 2013 at 11:46 am
More about the Ladue site than yours. Just seems like stories are staying up longer. Maybe its justRead More the summer doldrums.
Robin Tidwell June 12, 2013 at 11:51 am
I didn't notice sign-in issues for more than a day, but I don't sign in every time either. As forRead More "more stuff, less news," I agree with Fly - putting the blogs under the headlines in the same column can make it appear that blogs are news too. Unless it's mine, of course! ;) Guess the announcements take up more space, but don't ever seem to change. And if Patch is all about local, shouldn't there be fewer national ads - esp. the garbage ones like "5 Veggies that kill Belly Fat?" Ugh. Just my two cents...
Stephanie R. June 12, 2013 at 11:59 am
Robin, no one local is buying ads to replace the national GoogleAds. No story about Monday's cityRead More council meeting. Guess it's hard for one editor to cover 2-3 cities.
Scott Simon June 12, 2013 at 04:05 pm
Thomas, AMEN to this issue I raised earlier this year with the Chamber. Image is everything. And theRead More Olivette City Council saw this too and pulled the plug. Creve Coeur, not so much, LOL. Not sure what business you own but if I know and get the chance, I'll support you because your're a right-thinking kind of businessman who knows how to define LOCAL.
Scott Simon June 12, 2013 at 04:15 pm
I think it's AMAZING the Creve Coeur/Olivette Chamber can't hold its golf tournament at the CREVERead More COEUR Golf Club, insider the Dielmann Rec. Complex, named after the Chamber's MEMBERSHIP DIRECTOR. I'm amazed. Also not surprised.
Ryan June 13, 2013 at 09:16 am
http://www.ccochamber.com/ccochamber/event.jsp?id=249
Kurt Greenbaum (Editor) June 2, 2013 at 05:49 pm
Thank you, Susan! Very grateful for your feedback and we appreciate you being a Patch reader.
Scott Simon May 30, 2013 at 06:09 pm
Whaddaya expect, if it's not broken, fix it! Just like Creve Coeur Government!
Gregg Palermo (Editor) May 30, 2013 at 08:13 am
Thanks for asking! I'm working on a follow up story on that. Do you live in Orchard Lakes? What doRead More you think?
Chris June 6, 2013 at 09:39 am
I live in the subdivision and I can not wait for these offers to come in and to find out what isRead More going to happen. I for one plan on taking it if it is good. The subdivision is in rough shape, the sewers are falling apart and too many of the owners have moved away and just rent the homes to people who are not taking care of them or they are switching out tenants every year. If this one fails another will come and sooner or later one will get it. The hold outs are getting older and the younger families are going to jump at a chance to get out of their homes with doing absolutely no repairs.
Lindsay Toler (Editor) June 4, 2013 at 01:46 pm
It IS kinda pea-soup green. I like it - supposed to evoke "grassroots" news, I think!